Wednesday, May 25, 2005
Earlier this month, me and my dad took a wander around Brooklyn Heights. Here are two things we saw, as demonstrated by pictures he took: Chinese bridal parties taking pictures on the pier A random fashion shoot in a courtyard; later, we saw a male model doing something similar in an alley
posted by Mike B. at 1:16 PM
0 comments
I don't know if you all are regular readers of Something Awful, but if not, let me point you to their list of music trivia. It starts getting really good with the Tori Amos entry, and the RHCP thing is less funny simply because Motley Crue apparently went through a similar incident, except for real.
posted by Mike B. at 12:58 PM
0 comments
Two reviews in Flagpole this week: British Sea Power, who I am still unimpressed by, and a local Athens band called Jet By Day who, regrettably, seem to be getting national attention. I try and be fair about them, because I recognize that they're not my thing, but it's really, really hard, and I mostly fail. But, failure's fine, especially when it comes to reviewing indie-screamo. Uh, I mean, "heavy-indie-southern-rock." Also got the following note: Will someone tell your reviewer that Trail of Dead and British Sea Power ROCK! To which I can only say a) I'm pretty sure I agreed with you in re: Trail of Dead's rockingness, and b) British Sea Power rock? Really? Did I get the wrong album?
posted by Mike B. at 11:29 AM
0 comments
I swear I posted about this before, but anyway, here is an interview with my band. I am the primary answerer of two questions, one of which involves me discussing how Eminem is an inspiration, and the other consisting of mean things about musicians. It may be of interest.
posted by Mike B. at 11:21 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
This would probably be a little too indulgent of my OCD tendencies, but man, I wish they had one of these for the NYC subway. Not that it would stay current very long, but still.
posted by Mike B. at 5:00 PM
0 comments
Monday, May 23, 2005
The poll results here at the WB11 for the season finale of Gilmore Girls are interesting--surprising support for Lorelai's decision and hate for Emily & Richard. You may also want to browse the discussion board for the finale. UPDATE: Oddly enough, the discussion board got hacked and deleted, but even more oddly, I'd had a cache of it open in Opera for a few days, so here's the first page.
posted by Mike B. at 4:43 PM
0 comments
Hi to all coming over from Brooklyn Vegan. Just FYI, if you were impressed by the perspicacity of my answers, I'm always available for sex advice, so if you want to send me a question or two, I'll be happy to answer it here.
posted by Mike B. at 11:42 AM
0 comments
The Mountain Goats' "This Year" isn't a particularly good song, but I like it anyway. The first three verse stanzas are pretty much pointless on their own, only existing to serve as setup for the culminating line in the fourth stanza, "Twin high-maintenance machines," which hits pretty good until you think about it a little and it starts to remind you of Steppenwolf. (The band, not the book.) The singer belts out the lines in a totally inappropriate sort of lurge, and we know from previous experience that this forced hurl is not necessarily the best timbre for him, plus the music--well, it's nice that he was able make a distinct verse and chorus bit out of the same riff, I suppose, but that doesn't really excuse the paucity of the backing. Still, it all doesn't make too much difference when, after the third verse set (sixth stanza) he suddenly busts out with "There will be feasting / and dancing / in Jerusalem next year," ending smartly on a leading tone rather than on the tonic and sending him straight into the chorus. This is interesting to me because it's basically an adaptation of a common short-fiction technique: using familiar quotations from religion or pop culture, not to show off your obscurity as much as to present something we're all presumed to know as if to say, "Here, what I am feeling is so easy to understand that this person already has," while simultaneously ride on the inherited sense of profundity that a quotation carries with it. This will ring a bell for anyone who's ever read the creative writing of teenagers (favorites in my day included Nirvana, NIN, Ani, Tori, and Zeppelin--I can only imagine what the kids are quoting now. Anybody?) but JD's too good a writer to be using this as lazy shorthand. Instead, he's using it as productive shorthand, opening up a whole other series of associations and assumptions with, what, 10 words, always a good thing in these sorts of songs. I've been to three Passover seders now (well, 4 if you count the one at college, but I don't) and when they get to the climactic line of the ceremony, "Next year in Jerusalem!" it's always said with a real ruefulness. (I asked what they say for this line if you are having Passover in Jerusalem--"Next year at Aunt Ethyl's house"?--but it is merely omitted.) Because, of course, it's a line that predates the reformation of Israel by many, many years, and by now anyone with a brain knows that the fulfillment of that dream is not necessarily something to be celebrated. But what I love about "This Year" is that JD takes it back to its original context, which, because things are getting a bit too serious here, I'll call the "Mets context"--not a prophecy, in other words, but something to confer solace on the present-tense situation, a dream meant to give courage and hope rather than something can pencil into your daily planner, and I love that after all this very realist talk of cars and video games and scotch, he all of a sudden throws in this religious allusion that doesn't seem forced or slightly offensive, but instead fills in the gaps in the song (the interior mental state of the main character, which had only been hinted at before, is made pretty clear with this line) and works actually, not that different from how the allusion typically does, as I understand it. It's nice to see it reclaimed, because it is a great line, and Darnielle does it very well.
posted by Mike B. at 11:22 AM
0 comments
Steven Johnson's done the promised response on his blog, and mainly pleads incompleteness, which is fair. I'll drop him a line when I get a chance and ask if it's OK to reprint his e-mail and my response, as they may be of interest. But for now, you'll want to check out the older piece he links, which is from Discover, if you're a subscriber or have access to a good library. (Of course, if someone wanted to Lexis-Nexis it to me, I wouldn't complain.)
posted by Mike B. at 11:18 AM
0 comments
The Face Knife, on Revenge of the Sith and its place in the asshole-douche-Hammett cosmology.
posted by Mike B. at 11:09 AM
0 comments
I am indeed a participant in this week's Stylus UK Singles Jukebox--sadly, my most half-assed blurb was used (see if you can guess!) while one of my better ones, for "1 Thing," was left out, but all's fair in criticism and indoor baseball, or something.
posted by Mike B. at 10:46 AM
0 comments
|
|