| clap clap blog: we have moved | 
|   
	
	
HOME | 
ARCHIVES |   
E-mail      Me: TSC | MP3
   
 THE DAILY ROUTINE: Flux | Hillary | Zoilus | Jesse | Sasha F/J | PopText |  Tom B. | Popjustice | Bryan |  Anthony Recidivism | Boing | Stereo | Chris | Tiny |  Todd | DYFLY? |  Brooks |  Banana | Le Fou PUBLICATIONS I LIKE: Salon | PF | Stylus | OHINY | Gawker | Wonkette | Defame MP3BLOGS: Robots | Grammophone | Tofu | Bubblegum | Ticket | Catch | Douglas | Daughters | TTIKTDA | Byron | IHOP I SHOULD CHECK MORE OFTEN: Nate | be.jazz | Rambler | Some | Cyn | Simon | jaymc | Matos | Casper Gardner |  Keith | Marshall | No Fun | Diva | Waking | Marcello | Jakarta | A. Ross | Whatevs | Gutter RIP: NYLPM | Vadimus | Flyboy | TMFTML | Harm | Black Table |  Nick | 
| Thursday, May 29, 2003 
	
	Daily Kos makes a connection that had eluded me: if Rumsfeld is saying that we're not finding any WMD in Iraq because it might have destroyed them before the war, it's not just more backpedaling, it means that the war was objectively a farce, since the whole thing before was liberals saying that we want inspections to see if there are WMDs and conservatives saying they are there even if the idiot inspectors can't find them, and then demanding that Sadaam destroy them, and then saying he didn't and invading.  So if he destroyed them and we invaded anyway...uh, well, that's not good, folks.  Regardless of whether or not the war was A Good Thing, that's gonna hurt us a lot in the future if it turns out to be true.  | 
 
 |