clap clap blog: we have moved |
HOME |
ARCHIVES |
E-mail Me: TSC | MP3
 
THE DAILY ROUTINE: Flux | Hillary | Zoilus | Jesse | Sasha F/J | PopText |  Tom B. | Popjustice | Bryan |  Anthony Recidivism | Boing | Stereo | Chris | Tiny |  Todd | DYFLY? |  Brooks |  Banana | Le Fou PUBLICATIONS I LIKE: Salon | PF | Stylus | OHINY | Gawker | Wonkette | Defame MP3BLOGS: Robots | Grammophone | Tofu | Bubblegum | Ticket | Catch | Douglas | Daughters | TTIKTDA | Byron | IHOP I SHOULD CHECK MORE OFTEN: Nate | be.jazz | Rambler | Some | Cyn | Simon | jaymc | Matos | Casper Gardner |  Keith | Marshall | No Fun | Diva | Waking | Marcello | Jakarta | A. Ross | Whatevs | Gutter RIP: NYLPM | Vadimus | Flyboy | TMFTML | Harm | Black Table |  Nick |
Thursday, August 07, 2003
So here's what I don't get about the California recall: why are the Democrats "in disarray"? This is why we have centralized leadership of parties, people. Don't worry about looking stupid; just pick a candidate and go with it. What's the problem? All you have to do is identify one candidate as the de facto Democratic candidate, and it's a two-party race again. (Or, even better, a one-party-versus-many race.) And you don't have to drop Davis; we all know that even if you vote "no" on the recall, you still get to pick a candidate. So run two sets of commercials:
"Vote no on the recall. Paid for by friends of Gray Davis." "Vote no on the recall--and then, just in case, vote for X. Paid for by the Democratic Party." Seems all right to me. But Matt Y is right, I think--this is all pretty pointless unless someone actually has a proposal for fixing the budget. (And, I might add, it's doubtful anyone will, since the problem mainly lies in Washington.) UPDATE: Yeah, a candidate like this one.
|
|